The Opinion Page
News and comments about the issues facing today's SCM and Inventory Management professionals.
High performance athletes can teach us a great deal about what it takes to succeed in life, and in business. A while ago, I attended a reunion at my former rowing club in Mississauga, Canada. I competed and coached at elite levels back in the 1970's and 1980's, winning national and international championships. As a coach, I enjoyed similar results, but I never had a chance to represent my country in the Olympic Games. After a 25-year absence from the sport, the reunion was an opportunity to become re-acquainted with some of the athletes that I had introduced to rowing 30 years ago. How wonderful it was to mingle with athletes who had grown into World and Olympic Champions! They can now tell me, their old coach, more about the sport than I ever hoped to know! It was terrific to know that they had grown to such heights. How proud I was to have been associated with them. All of them had been successful in life outside of the competitive arena as well. They had become lawyers, doctors, architects, brokers, teachers, and one had grown into a photographer of considerable renown. Their progress on personal and professional levels was no accident. I commented at the event that the sport of rowing, and athletics in general, taught me many valuable lessons about human nature, motivation, commitment, teamwork, and even grace in failure. I have used many of these lessons daily in the arena of business management. I have used a rowing analogy numerous times in my presentations on strategic planning, which is a subject that is close to my heart. In business, we are really trying to accomplish the same thing as high performance athletes: succeed over the long term, according to the rules, and stay healthy in the process. Over and over again, I seem to return to the notion of Vision as being a key ingredient to athletic, business, and personal success. A few years ago, before the 2012 Olympic Games in London, I stumbled upon the remarkable story of British Olympian Greg Searle. At the time of the original publication of this article in the Wall Street Journal’s The Source on July 3, 2011, Searle, aged 39, was training to earn a spot on Britain’s 2012 Olympic rowing team. Since the publication of that article, Searle earned that spot. He competed in the Men’s Eight, regarded by many as the premier event in rowing at the Olympics. Searle first won gold at the 1992 Barcelona Olympics with his brother Jonny. In an appearance at the 1996 Atlanta Games, he earned a bronze medal. After a fourth-place finish in Sydney in 2000 he retired from top-level rowing to concentrate on his career as a practice director of performance development consultancy, Lane4. Searle draws on his extensive experience in high-performance sport as he offers five compelling lessons to business leaders, starting with “Vision:” 1. Find a vision; set short term goals to achieve overall success. A critical component of any strategic plan, the vision sits above everything else that we do. It needs to be an exciting articulation of the overall objective, which inspires people to follow. When London won the games, Searle thought to himself, “I want to be a part of that.” Smaller goals and objectives, which feed attainment of the vision, are set into a framework and are followed in a regimented fashion. Without the strength of the vision, it would be very difficult indeed to subject oneself, or others, to the everyday stresses and demands that are required. Searle comments, “So many leaders talk about goals and talk about a vision but they don’t make it exciting, compelling or engaging enough for people to want to achieve it. The great leaders are the ones that can create that enthusiasm for long term success which drives everyday behaviors in their team.” 2. Feedback is your best friend. The science of sport has progresses tremendously over the past thirty years. We are now able to measure physiological, psychological, and nutritional outputs like never before. As such, feedback to the athlete from coaches and trainers regarding his or her progress has improved dramatically. Results in British and Canadian programs have proven the worth of such feedback. “This is an important point for businesses and their leaders as many companies don’t use the support function as well as they ought to,” says Searle. “I receive constant feedback measured against the goals that I set at the beginning of the year. It’s the personal feedback regarding my impact—how I behave around the team and influence them, as well as how I move the boat—that I receive from my coach and fellow athletes that is most valuable. 3. Unshakeable self-belief. There is an important difference between the terms self-confidence, and self-esteem. We all make mistakes. Often, it has been said, a person’s true character is revealed in how that person recovers from failure. Failures can hurt, but they needn’t devalue a person’s sense of worth. It is a matter of framing those stumbles within a larger context of life accomplishment. Searle advises, “The respect you earn as a sportsman or in your career has been gained over the course of years. It’s important to remember that respect can’t be lost in the blink of an eye. On an individual basis, self-esteem is deep lying and built upon successes and setbacks over the course of a lifetime. As such it will not be affected by things that happen day-to-day but will be swayed over longer periods of time. Self-confidence however, is affected in the short-term by everyday events. Self confidence can afford to take a few knocks, but it’s vital to maintain self-esteem by reminding yourself of your successes in the past and that overall, your quality will shine through.” 4. Controlling the controllable. Early in my career in rowing, I used to take notice of my competitors’ reaction to the weather conditions. Many worried that it might be windy, it might be raining, or that it might be cold. I turned this into a competitive advantage. Why worry about something that I cannot control? It will only slow me down. Similarly, Searle sees the value of focusing on those things that will help your boat go faster, within the myriad issues that will impact your performance. “After that, he says, “it is simply a case of controlling your reaction to everything else.” “As a leader or a sportsman it’s important to be prepared by addressing the things that are within your control. In my sport it is a case of moving the boat as fast as you can down your lane. What the other boats do in their lanes is their concern. Any strategy needs to be based upon what we can do to make a difference to our performance to get the best result. I must admit that in Sydney in 2000, I thought our boat was inferior to our competitors’ boats. I remember that I let my mind drift and think about other things that were beyond my control. We came fourth. It was a lesson learned.” 5. Recognizing pressure as a positive While I loved the sport of rowing with all my heart, it was difficult for me to compete. So young, I saw pressure and stress as a negative. It was not until later in life that I understood how to put such pressure into perspective and turn it into a positive life force. Searle advises, “I know that I can perform at my best when I am under pressure. I don’t necessarily like it. I still get racked with self-doubt and nerves—but I know when I am in that situation I have to accept that feeling as it produces the best from me. It’s only halfway through the race that I realize I have found strength that I didn’t know was there. In a business environment there are high pressure situations to be dealt with every day, but often that pressure can help you become focused, sharp and at your best. The key is to recognize the symptoms and embrace them. You have to reframe the situation so it ceases to be a threat and becomes an opportunity. A vital coping strategy is to ensure you have other things in your life. I am a father with two kids. I can keep pressure in perspective. As I sit on the start line, I think about my daughter who was recently in her first swimming gala. When it comes to the Olympics, I will be in a boat with eight of my mates doing something that I have been doing for the last 20 years. I think that what I do isn’t tough compared to a 10 year-old facing the world and competing for the first time.”
0 Comments
I recently engaged in a conversation on Linkedin on the subject of "The Cost of Poor Management." The initiator of the conversation referenced a survey published in HC Online titled "Poor management responsible for negative impact on productivity." In summary, the article said:
"Workers believe the number one factor that negatively impacts employee productivity is poor management, according to the a survey conducted by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). The survey of 478 HR professionals and 613 employees found that the factors which negatively impacted upon productivity at work included: poor management (58 per cent); lack of motivation (38 per cent); organisational changes (26 per cent); a lack of defined goals in the job (24 per cent); readiness to leave the organisation (16 per cent); a lack of accountability in the job." This was my contribution: Dr. W. Edwards Deming had a lot to say about the state of American management, and it seems that we have not learned a great deal since he was alive. In his classic "Out of the Crisis" (1982), he commented: "Part of America's industrial problems is the aim of its corporate managers. Most American executives think they are in the business to make money, rather than products or service...The Japanese corporate credo, on the other hand, is that a company should become the world's most efficient provider of whatever product and service it offers. Once it becomes the world leader and continues to offer good products, profits follow." (pg. 99) Apart from Dr. Deming's considerable work on this subject, I recommend three contemporary books for some great insight: 1. "How the Mighty Fall" by Jim Collins 2. "Why Smart Executives Fail" by Sydney Finkelstein 3. "Crazy Bosses" by Stanley Bing (for a little comic relief) My personal opinion is that corporate America, with some notable exceptions, has lost its moral compass. Executives are rewarded whether they succeed or fail (to wit, the fiasco of October 2008). Why are some of the investment bankers not in jail for the fraud and damage that they have perpetrated on the world? There is no accountability, and Washington allows these shenanigans to carry on unabated. I am not part of the "Occupy Wall Street" crowd, and I do feel that the capitalist system provides the best chance for the most people to participate in the wealth that western countries provide, but I do sympathize with some of the protesters' concerns. People need to be treated with respect, not threatened and bullied by senior management. Executives need to have a long-term view of the health of their organizations rather than become enslaved to next week's share prices. I have seem company after company lose good - nay, great - people to burn-out, disgust, and inability to make a contribution. I have seen executives bring companies to their knees by their own hubris, walk away with millions in severance in their pockets, leaving hundreds of workers devastated by their curious decisions. We cannot continue on this path, We, in this forum and others, have dedicated ourselves to finding professional enlightenment. If we find ourselves in a position of power, we need, I believe, to be strong evangelists for ethical and forward-thinking business practices. We need to build this culture in our own teams, and export it to others. We need, I believe, to recognize the values of ethics, respect, and fair treatment as Best Practices. We know what these practices are. We simply have to live them, every day. Further to my comment on October 20, 2011 titled "The Cost of Poor Management", please read the article at the following link:
http://finance.sympatico.ca/home/contentposting_reuters/steve_jobs_bio_says_apple_ceo_abhorred_corrupt_execs/32b6e2d7 I have pasted the entire article here, for your amusement. CBC News The late Apple CEO Steve Jobs - in an upcoming authorized biography - calls the crop of executives brought in to run Apple after his ouster in 1985 "corrupt people" with "corrupt values" who cared only about making money. Jobs was often bullied in school and stopped going to church at age 13, according to Steve Jobs, by Walter Isaacson, which will be published Monday by Simon & Schuster. The Associated Press purchased a copy Thursday. Advance sales of the biography have topped bestseller lists since Jobs died Oct. 5 after a long battle with cancer at age 56. According to the book, Jobs never went back to church after he saw a photo of starving children on the cover of Life Magazine. Later, he spent years studying Zen Buddhism. As a teenager, he exhibited some odd behaviours - he began to try various diets, eating just fruits and vegetables for a time, and perfected staring at others without blinking. Apple named after 'fruitarian' diet phase Later, on the naming of Apple, Jobs told Isaacson he was "on one of my fruitarian diets." He'd just come back from an apple orchard, and he thought the name sounded "fun, spirited and not intimidating." Jobs reveals in the book that he didn't want to go to college, and the only school he applied to was costly private college Reed in Portland, Ore. Once accepted, his parents tried to talk him out of attending Reed, but he told them he wouldn't go to college at all if they didn't let him go there. Though he ended up attending, Jobs dropped out of the school after less than a year and never went back. His pre-Apple job as a technician at Atari paid $5 per hour. He saw a classified ad in the San Jose Mercury News, went to visit the company and informed them he wouldn't leave unless they hired him. Jobs's eye for simple, clean design was evident from early on. The case of the Apple II computer had originally included a Plexiglas cover, metal straps and a roll-top door. Jobs, though, wanted something elegant that would make Apple stand out. Computer case inspired by kitchenware He told Isaacson he was struck by Cuisinart food processors while browsing at a department store and decided he wanted a case made of moulded plastic. He called Jonathan Ive, Apple's design chief, his "spiritual partner" at Apple. He told Isaacson that Ive had "more operation power" at Apple than anyone besides Jobs himself - that there was no one at the company who could tell Ive what to do. That, says Jobs, is "the way I set it up." Jobs was never a typical CEO. Apple's first president, Mike Scott, was hired mainly to manage Jobs, then 22. One of his first projects: getting Jobs to bathe more often. It didn't really work. Jobs's dabbling in LSD and other aspects of 1960s counterculture has been well documented. In the book, Jobs says LSD "reinforced my sense of what was important - creating great things instead of making money, putting things back into the stream of history and of human consciousness as much as I could." In the early 1990s, after Jobs was ousted from Apple, he watched the company's gradual decline from afar. He was angered by the new crop of people brought in to run Apple, and he called them "corrupt." Dream to get the Beatles on iTunes He told Issacson they cared only about making money "for themselves mainly, and also for Apple - rather than making great products." He also revealed that the Beatles is one of his favourite bands, and one of his wishes was to get the band on iTunes before he died. He got them available for sale on iTunes in late 2010. Until then, the biggest-selling, most influential group in rock history had been glaringly absent from iTunes and other legal online music services. The book was originally called "iSteve" and scheduled to come out in March 2012. The release date was moved up to November, then, after Jobs's death, to this coming Monday. Isaacson interviewed Jobs more than 40 times, including just a few weeks before his death. The book says Jobs put no subject off limits and had no control over its contents. We had a discussion on Linkedin recently on the topic of why the average average employee tenure with North American companies these days is 2.5 years. There appears to be little or no loyalty on either side of the employee/employer relationship. Today, I was reminded of a classic Country and Western song that might shed some light on the subject. (Tompall Glaser lyrics):
Put another log on the fire. Cook me up some bacon and some beans. And go out to the car and change the tyre. Wash my socks and sew my old blue jeans. Come on, baby, you can fill my pipe, And then go fetch my slippers. And boil me up another pot of tea. Then put another log on the fire, babe, And come and tell me why you're leaving me. Now don't I let you wash the car on Sunday? Don't I warn you when you're gettin fat? Ain't I a-gonna take you fishin' with me someday? Well, a man can't love a woman more than that. Ain't I always nice to your kid sister? Don't I take her driving every night? So, sit here at my feet 'cos I like you when you're sweet, And you know it ain't feminine to fight. So, put another log on the fire. Cook me up some bacon and some beans. Go out to the car and lift it up and change the tyre. Wash my socks and sew my old blue jeans. Come on, baby, you can fill my pipe, And then go fetch my slippers. And boil me up another pot of tea. Then put another log on the fire, babe, And come and tell me why you're leaving me. In other words, treat employees like human beings, ethically, and with respect. If you don't, you get what you deserve. A colleague of mine put it very succinctly: "employees don't leave jobs....they leave bosses." How true. JDS Back in June of this year, I was preparing to write an article about fear and frustration in the workplace. As I was driving along a road close to my home, I had my radio tuned in, as usual, to Q107 in Toronto. I must have been aligned with the Tao that morning, because they played "Maggie's Farm" by Bob Dylan - what a fabulous expression of the ultimate toxic workplace. Here are the lyrics, but you should research the audio for a big kick (it has also been done by The Grateful Dead, among others, but Dylan's original is the best!):
Maggie’s Farm By Bob Dylan I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more. No, I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more. Well, I wake in the morning, Fold my hands and pray for rain. I got a head full of ideas That are drivin' me insane. It's a shame the way she makes me scrub the floor. I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more. I ain't gonna work for Maggie's brother no more. No, I ain't gonna work for Maggie's brother no more. Well, he hands you a nickel, He hands you a dime, He asks you with a grin If you're havin' a good time, Then he fines you every time you slam the door. I ain't gonna work for Maggie's brother no more. I ain't gonna work for Maggie's pa no more. No, I ain't gonna work for Maggie's pa no more. Well, he puts his cigar out In your face just for kicks. His bedroom window It is made out of bricks. The National Guard stands around his door. Ah, I ain't gonna work for Maggie's pa no more. I ain't gonna work for Maggie's ma no more. No, I ain't gonna work for Maggie's ma no more. Well, she talks to all the servants About man and God and law. Everybody says She's the brains behind pa. She's sixty-eight, but she says she's twenty-four. I ain't gonna work for Maggie's ma no more. I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more. No, I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more. Well, I try my best To be just like I am, But everybody wants you To be just like them. They sing while you slave and I just get bored. I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more I came across this article today - interesting perspective. I have often wondered why corporations frequently talk the good talk about hiring caring and ethical managers, then reward and promote the sociopaths. (I have my opinions, of course). Enjoy!
http://hbr.org/2011/07/why-fair-bosses-fall-behind/ar/1 On June 17, I posted an article about the toxic workplace. Here is a follow-up, to provide a few ideas about tools that might help to combat the fear that might be leading to suffering in your business.
Value Statement: Publish a Statement of Values as an integral part of the firm’s Strategic Plan. This provides moral clarity to the firm’s management team. The Value Statement holds managers to account when toxic practices creep into the business’ landscape. Employee awareness is critical. New Hires: Due diligence with respect to potential new employees should include an assessment of the person’s ability to exemplify company values. Orientation should clearly articulate expectations and responsibilities. The Employee Engagement Survey: A well-considered employee engagement survey, governed by strict confidentiality rules, allows employees to express attitudes and fears honestly. Results must be reviewed with equanimity. Develop and execute an action plan to address difficulties. For larger companies, a third party administrator helps ensure objectivity. The Human Resources Manager: The professional HR Manager can act as a strong facilitator, advocate, ombudsman and broker to resolve issues of fear. The HR Manager may act as an unbiased and thoughtful representative of the company who will seriously consider concerns of both employee and manager. The HR Manager can diffuse many small concerns before they become unmanageable. The Employee Assistance Program: Fear can provoke reactions that range from counterproductive to dangerous. It can manifest itself in afflictions such as depression, substance abuse, absenteeism, and antisocial behaviour. The company-sponsored EAP provides concerned employees with an outlet to express problems, and take positive steps toward resolution. An Employee Hotline: A company-sponsored 1-800 hotline allows employees and managers to report problematic behaviour and to express a wide range of concerns safely and anonymously. Issues revealed via the hotline must be acted upon with great urgency. The Joint Health and Safety Committee: The Ontario Ministry of Labour mandates the establishment of a Health and Safety Committee for workplaces employing twenty or more persons. An engaged and empowered H&S team does not focus simply on hardhats and forklifts – it can act upon a variety of counterproductive behaviours. The economic loss created by fear in the workplace is immeasurable. Employees who labour within a command-and-control management hierarchy are frequently motivated by threat and coercion. Not only does fear destroy any sense of team spirit and pride, but it also shuts down important communication channels, inhibiting the flow of creative, constructive, and corrective ideas upstream.
Just how might the front-line employee fall victim to fear at the workplace? In the 1992 classic movie Glengarry Glen Ross, Alec Baldwin masterfully portrays the character Blake, who motivates a small real estate sales staff through fear and intimidation. The results of Blake’s sales contest, where salesmen placing below second place get fired, are tragic. Indeed, failure is guaranteed and engineered into the process. The characters endure humiliation, desperation, deceit, theft, and scandal as they grasp at dignity and struggle to salvage their jobs, by any means necessary. Workplace fear and intimidation might not play out as dramatically as it did in Glengarry Glen Ross. Nevertheless, it is real and equally menacing. The weapons of fear include threats, harassment, exclusion, and unattainable goals. The fearful employee worries that he will lose his job, be demoted, be denied salary increases, be assigned menial tasks, or otherwise be constructively dismissed. Working in a constant backdrop of a fearful environment, the employee may become withdrawn, vengeful, depressed, abusive, or even violent. Quality Management guru, the late Dr. W. Edwards Deming, included “Drive Out Fear” as one of his famous “Fourteen Points” for achieving total quality in business. Deming was concerned mostly about the kind of fear that prevents the average worker from finding out how to do the job correctly. He worried about the fear that prevents employees from asking questions, from rocking the boat, from suggesting new ideas, and from challenging the status quo. "Fear takes a horrible toll,” said Dr. Deming. “Fear is all around, robbing people of their pride, hurting them, and denying them a chance to contribute to the company." In the 1960’s, Douglas McGregor of MIT’s Sloan School of Management developed what came to be known as “Theory X” of organizational behaviour. The Theory X manager has little respect for employees. He considers them to be lazy, work-averse, and motivated only by self-interest. He feels threatened by the employee who asks too many questions. As such, the Theory X manager institutes a system of close supervision and tight controls, bolstered by a culture of blame. Within this punitive environment, employees learn to mistrust management. They keep quiet. Such a tyrannical manager may be successful in the short term, but fails dismally in the long haul, leaving behind him a trail of destruction and shattered lives. McGregor found that this approach is a major cause of diseconomies of scale in large businesses, and proved it to be counter-effective. Valuable employees may simply leave the toxic workplace. This is terribly costly to any enterprise. Human Resources expert Susan M. Heathfield of Michigan State University offers advice in her “Top Ten Ways to Retain Your Great Employees”. Gathering data from exit interviews, Heathfield proposes antidotes. She has concludes that in order to retain great employees, firms should:
The enlightened manager encourages participation and input. She fosters an environment of learning and interaction. She is self-confident, but not narcissistic. She puts the welfare of the company ahead of her personal aspirations. She is a team leader. She treats her staff’s opinions with respect. She entrenches processes that allow suggestions for continuous improvement initiative. She knows how to answer questions about methods and procedures, or knows how to get the answers. She takes great joy in seeing her employees grow, get promoted, and get raises in pay. She builds enduring teams of people who love their work. She will succeed. This is a follow up to my article "High Impact Strategic Planning" also published in the Durham Business Times, February 2011 edition. Ten Toxins emphasizes certain issues that work to impair the development of a high quality Strategic Plan:
Ten Toxins Short-sightedness: Do not confuse short-term tactics with strategic objectives. While less spectacular than tactical victories, a long-term view is necessary to win the war. Hypocrisy: Core values must be lived every day by everyone. A leader who ignores core values will develop employees who view ethics as mere distractions. Truly believe your Mission. The Silver Bullet: Strategy should not be designed around the notion of having, or finding one magical solution that will resolve all the firm’s problems. Solutions are multidimensional. Nostalgia: We live in a world of change, innovation and fleeting fashion. Ensure that your products and services are not designed to meet obsolete demand. Strategy looks forward. Stay current. Remain aware of your products’ life cycles. Ineffective Communication: All jobs must relate to the strategic plan. Keep constrained resources, including the work force, focused on the plan. By tying performance metrics to strategic objectives, management keeps attention directed at the appropriate goals. Fear: A culture of fear in an organization will prohibit the free flow of information. Encourage employees to provide constructive feedback, without the potential for recrimination. Pyrrhic Victories: Beware of exhausting all of your resources fighting tactical battles. Be realistically aware of constraints that face your enterprise. Ensure that you are able to obtain sufficient resources to achieve your strategic goals. If not, modify the objectives. Not Working the Plan: A plan will not inspire while gathering dust on the shelf. Communicate it, live it, revisit it, and revise it. Put your work front and centre in your firm. Complexity: Complex strategies are difficult to communicate and dilute intent. Employees will be reluctant to embrace them. Craft three to five strategic objectives. Elegant simplicity is the key. Ambiguity: Use straightforward, impactful language. Ensure that the intent of each word or phrase is clear. Remember the SMART acronym. Here are profiles of two very different supervisors:
"Boss A": As an employee, you would describe this person as friendly, easily approachable, and helpful. Knowledgeable about the business and the company, "Boss A" freely shares her skills and knowledge with you and your peers. Her knowledge has been gained both by experience within the industry and your company, as well as solid training and education from outside the company. She is a fan of continuous improvement both on personal and business levels. She demonstartes enthusiasm about the strong points of your company, and a desire to change the weaknesses and gaps. She encourages learning, and sets education of her employees as a high departmental expense priority. She allows her own career to move more slowly than it otherwise might, due to the resources that she devotes to her team. "Boss B": This gentleman is very well-educated, holding an MBA from an Ivy League University. He is incredibly driven, grasping business issues aggressively with his own hands. He is less experienced in your industry than Boss A, but makes up for it in terms of enthusiasm. He runs the business "by the numbers", valuing results very highly, His focus is on the current and next fiscal Quarter. Since joining the team 6 months ago, he has achieved all the results that were asked of him - increased sales, reduced costs, reduced inventories and increased speed of delivery. He is a skilled orator. The Executive Committee has put this chap on the "fast track" towards quickly increasing levels of responsibility, with a view to installing him as a Vice President within the next couple of years. Which one of the two is the real leader? I have been blessed to work with and for some people whom I consider to be real leaders. These were people who taught me the way business ought to work. People who were altruistic. They took great pride in the work of their subordinates, and valued employee development very highly. They commanded respect. They were approachable, and largely open-minded. They were visionaries. They wanted the Team, and the Firm to succeed. Most had learned the business from the ground, up. These people included my rowing coach, Mike E., who guided me and my crew to two Henley Championships, and who shaped many of my attitudes towards elite sports and life. There was Mr. Chapman, mentioned in this blog before, who was one of the great unsung visionaries in supply chain management in the 1970's and 1980's. There was Wendy J., my mentor for many years and a great team builder. My list includes Tahira H., who was probably the most naturally intelligent leader who I have ever met. There was Colin P., for whom I would have punched my way through a brick wall if he had asked me. And there was Doug P., who showed such respect and support towards his employees and was never truly recognized for his efforts. These leaders had a number of things in common: they learned their business with a grass roots approach. They paid their dues. They put business and team efforts ahead of individual aspirations, even their own, They did what they knew was right, and achieved material success as a byproduct. They were approachable. They thought in holistic terms, understanding the interrelatioships in the organization and between people. They were thrilled when one of their employees stepped up another rung in the career ladder. And they truly cared. I have worked for the other kind of supervisor as well. Some were friendly and approachable, and some had been put into impossible situations, and just did the best that they could. But often I could not help but get the feeling that the purpose of my work was to advance their careers, not for the betterment ot the company. And that is a very poor motivator. They taught me very little, and I felt my own level of fulfillment diminishing. And because of their lack of experience, they frequently lacked the skill set to resolve the really big problems. In fact, their interference in the solution tended to cause more harm than good. They tended to withold information, lest the workers interrupt their agenda. They liked to maintain the "status quo" in their staffing arrangements, especially if the team were somehow working fairly smoothly, abnd would occasionally block an employees career progress. The worst of these supervisors were bullies, relying on threats to get the job done. Dr. Deming was no fan of hiring graduates out of college or university, and dropping them into management positions within a company. He believed that in order to be effective supervisors, individuals need to know the work of the people that they supervise. It is, or should be management's responsibility to remove barriers that exist which inhibit workers' ability to do their job. Make it easy to do the job correctly. These barriers might include a focus on producing things quickly rather than properly. They might include emphasis on numbers rather than quality.They might inlude accepting sub-par input materials at cheap cost, use of poor tools, and turning a deaf ear to workers' suggestions. Deming argued that the one thing that novice managers fresh out of school can do is count. Therefore the metrics became paramount: quantity of output, costs of products and cost variances, quotas and sales all became the Holy Grails of business. One of the problems with the "promotion from within" approach, on the other hand, is that the best employees usually become the supervisors (nepotism and office politics aside) and this leaves a gap in the skills of the work force. But at least the kowledgeable supervisor can teach and mentor the new employee in methods and processes. Many colleagues of mine have complained incessantly about the culture of their old, and previously successful employers. "It has been ruined" they cry. The company is no longer what it was. It has been taken over by MBA's fresh out of grad school, consultants, and bean-counters. It's sad that once proud organizations lose their way in this manner. Somewhere, buried in the basement with the old tax files, are the core competencies and spirit that made such companies great. It is management's job to help others do their jobs better - in other words, to lead. My true hope is that a few of my own employees look back at me as a leader, rather than merely a supervisor. That would be a nice legacy to have. |
AuthorJohn Skelton is the Principal Consultant and founder of Strategic Inventory Management. Archives
August 2016
Categories
All
|